City Council may turn back the clock on pay-to-play

In 2011, the Plainfield City Council voted to enact strong pay-to-play legislation through a set of ordinances. These set strict limits for vendors’ political contributions to local candidates who’d control awarding of contracts.

The ordinance with the most teeth was MC 2011-11, which notably set a $300 local donation limit for individuals associated with vendors, and $2500 for groups of people linked to any one vendor.

Current City Council president Rebecca Williams, Councilor Cory Storch, and Mayor Adrian Mapp all served on the governing body at that time. They all voted “yes” for the ordinance MC 2011-11, which was written by the Citizens Campaign but sponsored by Storch himself. Only Councilors Rivers and Greaves voted “no”, and the legislation passed 5-2. See Bernice Paglia’s post about the November 2011 meeting.

Williams’ support was no surprise. In a January 2011 blog post (here), Williams, then brand new to the Council, stated her desire to enact “the strongest municipal pay-to-play legislation possible.” It was part of her election platform.

Later that year, when the legislation was on the table, Williams posted (here) on her blog again in effort to push it through. “It is estimated that New Jersey residents pay upwards of 15-20% more for services in the form of padded contracts which are often awarded to vendors in exchange for making  contributions to politicians,” said Williams regarding pay-to-play. “Now is the time to get it done.”

cory1

Like Williams, Councilor Storch took to the blogosphere (here) to advocate on behalf of residents. “You can become a favored vendor by making campaign contributions to politicians in power who have the ability to influence the awarding of contracts,” explained Storch.

“The cost of these contributions gets passed on to the taxpayers through the contracts approved by municipal councils and freeholder boards. This is a double whammy because the incentive for vendors to do good work is diminished – why try hard to please the customer when you get the contract through an insider arrangement behind closed doors?” he asked.

After it was passed, Storched called it “an important moment for local government” before suggesting the ordinance could even be strengthened in the future. Williams and Storch both made a strong argument for this legislation.

So it caught me by surprise when I heard about Ordinance MC 2017-02, to be voted on tomorrow (Tuesday, January 17). This ordinance would gut 2011’s pay to play restrictions. Word is the sponsors are none other than Storch and Williams.

Ordinance Amending Chapter 2 Adminstration, Article 10, Sections 2:19-22 would be entirely removed with four “yes” votes tomorrow. Gone. Eliminated. Crossed out, literally. Every single word. Take a look yourself here.

If MC 2017-02 is passed, political contributions will become a relative free-for-all, brought upon by the same group who promised to reign in corruption.

According to Cory Storch – the 2011 version – pay-to-play “enables the party and people in power to amass huge war chests that are a disadvantage to outsiders, newcomers, and non-incumbents who want to run for office.” Apparently, now, that’s exactly what they want.

Pay-to-play reform may have sounded like a nice idea to Mapp, Williams, and Storch as they sat on the outside looking in, just over five years ago. But now that they are themselves in power, it’s time to turn back the clock. Pay-to-play is back in play. Democracy be damned. Taxpayers too.

In one of those 2011 blog posts, Rebecca Williams urged us to hold her and her colleagues accountable. I suggest we do just that.

Tomorrow’s (January 17) combined City Council agenda fixing and business Meeting starts at 7pm in Municipal Court. Encourage the City Council to say no to pay-to-play. If it wasn’t right in 2011, it’s not right in 2017.

5 thoughts on “City Council may turn back the clock on pay-to-play

  1. Amen! I know it costs money to run a campaign, but this isn’t solely about candidates getting money, it is about the integrity of our elections when vendors, either prospective or current, essentially become the financiers of municipal political campaigns. Engineering firms, law firms, and auditing firms have been particularly abusive in Plainfield, and no mayor or City Council member has yet shown the fortitude to stand for reform in practice without substantial shaming. The ordinance we have had in place since 2011 should be made less ambiguous in some respects, and the penalties more punitive, but this is no time to open the spigot. Over the past two-years Mayor Mapp has raised over $200,000 with plenty more to come between now and the June primary, so raising money may be tough, but it is always enough. We shouldn’t want to become a cesspool of cash like East Orange or Jersey City.

  2. Alan, how ironic that you mention East Orange and Jersey City. The Mayor has close political ties to both cities, along with Orange and Irvington. So here we go again, same corruption, new faces.
    Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely!!!

  3. The City of Plainfield will never be more than it is now. A safe haven for illegals, drug dealers,
    Crooked politicians and of course Ministers. Apathetic residents, uneducated youth etc, all
    result in State and Federal funds. There is a lot of profit in Urban Communities, unfortunately
    the money goes straight to the top. The people who contribute to campaigns and host parties
    for politicians also reap rewards i.e., appointments to boards and/or jobs. This will never change.

    Mayor Mapp did what all politicians do…give false hope. I am so disappointed in him. He has
    learned from the mistakes of the people he has worked for and with in Orange all other cities
    he has ties to. Unfortunately the people of Plainfield will pay for in more ways than one. He
    is perhaps smarter than Gerry Green could ever be. Watch out Plainfield, you are in for a
    Bumpy Ride.

  4. The City of Plainfield will never be more than it is now. A safe haven for illegals, drug dealers,
    Crooked politicians and of course Ministers. Apathetic residents, uneducated youth etc, all
    result in State and Federal funds. There is a lot of profit in Urban Communities, unfortunately
    the money goes straight to the top. The people who contribute to campaigns and host parties
    for politicians also reap rewards i.e., appointments to boards and/or jobs. This will never change.

    Mayor Mapp did what all politicians do…give false hope. I am so disappointed in him. He has
    learned from the mistakes of the people he has worked for and with in Orange all other cities
    he has ties to. Unfortunately the people of Plainfield will pay for in more ways than one. He
    is perhaps smarter than Gerry Green could ever be. Watch out Plainfield, you are in for a
    Bumpy Ride.

  5. I went to the council meeting last night. I spoke on the issue of Pay to Play. Two council members stated the truth, though not mentioned, No money for Mayor Sharon Briggs, Money for Mapp. Now in all honesty they didn’t come right out and say that but you would have to be a fool not to know. If I’m not mistaken doesn’t Mapp work in Orange and Isn’t Orange being investigated for corruption by the FBI? Are we all blind in Plainfield. We have to stop voting the line and vote the person.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s